Learn about our physician preference medical and surgical supplies
Learn about our commitment to supporting health systems through quality medical supplies and robust supply chain strategies
Blood collection devices sit at the intersection of patient safety, occupational health, and diagnostic accuracy. As regulatory expectations continue to evolve, laboratories and healthcare facilities must ensure that the devices they use are not only clinically effective, but also fully compliant with U.S. and applicable global standards. In 2026, regulators are placing increased emphasis on risk management, labeling clarity, material safety, and post-market oversight — making regulatory literacy a practical necessity, not just a procurement concern.
Difficult blood draws are an unavoidable reality in clinical practice. Small or rolling veins, dehydration, pediatric patients, and chronic illness all increase the likelihood of failed venipuncture attempts. When first-stick success drops, the consequences extend beyond patient discomfort — delays in diagnosis, compromised sample quality, increased sharps exposure, and staff frustration quickly follow.
Blood collection is one of the most common clinical procedures, yet it remains one of the most nuanced. The choice between a syringe draw and an evacuated tube system (ETS) is rarely arbitrary — it directly influences first-stick success, specimen integrity, sharps safety, and overall workflow efficiency. While both methods are widely used, understanding where each excels can help facilities standardize smarter, safer blood collection protocols across patient populations and care settings.
Choosing between syringe and the evacuated tube system (ETS) is not a preference—it’s a clinical decision that affects sample quality, staff safety, throughput, and total cost. Use the ETS to standardize and scale. Use syringes when veins won’t tolerate vacuum. In both cases, reduce touch points, follow IFUs, and deploy the right accessories (safety tube holders and closed blood transfer devices) to protect people and specimens.
Hemolysis is a leading cause of rejected specimens and redraws. In high‑throughput hospital settings, even a small reduction can reclaim hours of staff time and improve turnaround. This guide focuses on chair‑side techniques, IFU‑aligned training, and device selection to reduce hemolysis in blood collection while maintaining speed and safety.
Hospitals don’t really buy “needles”—they buy outcomes. In 2025, the best blood collection sets for hospitals are the ones that consistently reduce needlestick risk, raise first-stick success, lower hemolysis, and improve the true total cost of care.
In blood collection, “cheapest” and “best value” are rarely the same thing. A device’s sticker price ignores costs that matter more to patients and operations—injury risk, redraws, and lost minutes at the bedside. When you model the Total Cost of Safety (TCS) you can justify safety-engineered devices with a business case that stands up to Value Analysis, Supply Chain, and Finance.
Supply disruptions and system outages expose vulnerabilities in blood collection processes- ranging from fragmented device choices and inconsistent techniques to mismatched cart setups across units and improvised substitutions during backorders. The result is foreseeable—more redraws, more sharps waste, and more stress on staff and patients. A resilient, sustainable program flips the script by standardizing devices, codifying inventory logic, and rehearsing downtime, so care continues smoothly—even when operations don’t. This playbook defines a framework for establishing an emergency-ready, low-waste blood collection program leveraging on RELI® devices, validated inventory management protocols, and simple drills that can be standardized across units.
In today’s healthcare environment, patient experience is as important as clinical accuracy. For many patients, a blood draw can be one of the most anxiety-provoking moments of a visit. Their comfort and trust not only shape how they perceive the procedure but also influence their willingness to return for future care.For providers, this means that phlebotomy isn’t just a technical skill — it’s a patient-facing experience. Listening to the voice of the patient helps us understand their concerns and guide every step: technique, communication, and even the choice of blood-collection devices.
.jpg)
.png)
%20(1).png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)